03 May 2005 @ 01:34 am
go figure
On some level, I suppose I've always been aware of this, but occasionally it's driven home to me in a big way. That is, stuff that really, really seems to bug most people---and especially, bug most women about men---really doesn't bother me. While stuff that most people don't care about---again, especially most women about men---really, really gets to me.

Take cockiness, for instance. I like some cockiness in a person. As a woman, I like it especially in a man. And as long as that man listens to me, I don't feel in the least inclined to "teach him a lesson" by stifling that attribute. But if a person---or again, a man---is careless or blind or stupid, I want nothing much to do with him. I'll simply find someone else to spend my time with.

Is it the lesson-teaching thing that gets me? Am I the only one who thinks that's an utter waste of time? A person---male or female---will be who they are, regardless of how you try to change them to match your ideals. If you can't like something about a person, I'm of the opinion that you simply call them on it. And if they won't listen---it's all right if they don't agree---I don't get close to them, *can't* get close to them. Is that simplistic? Immature? Because, I gotta say, romance novels notwithstanding, "teaching a lesson" seems the true immaturity.

On the other hand...maybe this is why I don't date? Oy. Head. Hurts.

.........................
 
 
Love Song: Dave Matthews Band - Raven
Prepare a Face: dizzy
 
 
( Post a new comment )
[identity profile] mneme-metis.livejournal.com on May 13th, 2005 04:03 am (UTC)
I never much liked those stories where the woman goes about trying to change the man because she somehow knows so much better, or vice versa. If you have to make someone change that seems to imply they aren't the one for you. Well, maybe that's a bit harsh. I guess it depends on what is being changed. But it seems to me in a relationship type situation, compromise it a better course then just making one person change. And now that I'm rereading my comment, I don't even know if it applies to your post. Ack, my head hurts a tad now. :)
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
[identity profile] in-omnia.livejournal.com on May 20th, 2005 01:52 am (UTC)
Wow. I just seem to be finding all these hidden gems of responses tonight. I didn't even know this was here until about five minutes ago. I'm an idiot. ;)

At any rate, I'm glad to hear someone out there agrees with me on the 'woman changing a man' thing. And I definitely agree with you on the if someone needs changing, they aren't the one for you...assuming the thing needing changing is a big deal, at least to you. :D

And although I know the 'Character A changing Character B' plot is a favorite in books or movies (Grease, anyone?), I can't stand it when it's one-sided. If Character A gets to change Character B, then Character B should have the same effect. Otherwise, their relationship is just...sad, somehow. Unequal. It's that soul-mate fantasy short story all over again. Each person should make the other better, not one person reaching down from their pedestal to pluck the other up to their level. Yich!

To be honest, I'm not sure where I was going with the original rant. Just too many ideas swirling in my head, needing outlet. A fuzzy, incomprehensible outlet, granted, but I felt *much* better after writing it. Reading your response, even several days later, certainly didn't hurt either. ;)
(Reply) (Parent) (Link)